The intarwebs think I'm a guy. *sob*

[eurydicebound]

The Blogalyser reveals...

Your blog/web page text has an overall readability index of 11.
This suggests that your writing style is conventional
(to communicate well you should aim for a figure between 10 and 20).
Your blog has 18 sentences per entry, which suggests your general message is distinguished by verbosity
(writing for the web should be concise).

CHARACTER MATRIX

male		female
self		world
past		future

Your text shows characteristics which are 56% male and 44% female
(for more information see the Gender Genie).
Looking at pronoun indicators, you write mainly about yourself, then the world in general and finally your social circle. Also, your writing focuses primarily on the present, next the past and lastly the future.

Find out what your blogging style is like!

Comments

This thing is a crock!

[knowmad.livejournal.com]

Oh jumpin' jeeziz ...

The Blogalyser reveals...

Your blog/web page text has an overall readability index of 9.
This suggests that your writing style is simplistic
(to communicate well you should aim for a figure between 10 and 20).
Your blog has 19 sentences per entry, which suggests your general message is distinguished by verbosity
(writing for the web should be concise).

CHARACTER MATRIX
Your text shows characteristics which are 49% male and 51% female
(for more information see the Gender Genie (http://bookblog.net/gender/genie.php)).
Looking at pronoun indicators, you write mainly about yourself, then the world in general and finally your social circle. Also, your writing focuses primarily on the present, next the past and lastly the future.

Find out what your blogging style is like! (http://www.blogalyser.com/blogalyser.htm)

Writing style is "simplistic?" Granted, I'm not doing articles here, but I think "simplistic" is pretty off the mark!

Verbose, sure ... I am okay with that. It's MY fuggin' blog!

And, um ... I guess I'm close to being androgynous here? Umm ...

... and might I add ...

[knowmad.livejournal.com]

" you write mainly about yourself, then the world in general "

That should be "than the world in general ... "

[themoocow.livejournal.com]

Wait.... you're not? *ducks* ;)

Re: ... and might I add ...

[elissa-carey.livejournal.com]

Only if it were a comparison. Do you write about yourself more than the world in general? :)

Re: ... and might I add ...

[knowmad.livejournal.com]

You don't think it is a comparison? You write more about yourself THAN you write about the world in general?

If it's supposed to be "then," it'd be a sequence ... you write more about yourself, then you write about the world in general, then you do your laundry, etc.

Possible, but pretty awkward!

[oldmangrumpus.livejournal.com]

If it makes any difference to you I got the same results and I sure don't feel 44% female......

[mudcactus.livejournal.com]

actually, it has you pretty much in the middle of male/female. You are not writing with enough gender sterotypes to tip the scale one way or another.

Of course, one wonders what the test writers are using to determine male vs female. If I wrote "Football" 40 times in my blog, would that affect the score?

Can't test mine cause this test checks public posts only..and 99% of my posts are sectioned off in some way.

Re: ... and might I add ...

[elissa-carey.livejournal.com]

It is a sequence. The "and finally" lets you know.

Re: ... and might I add ...

[knowmad.livejournal.com]

Hmm, okay, I can see it now, though I still deem it to be a pretty awkward way to say it. YMMV, it ought to go without saying.